• Home
  • About
  • Legal Specialties
  • Attorneys
  • Contact Us
  • Multi Media
  • The Law Show
  • Brian's Blog
  • Dailey Legal Gem

Hormone therapy suspected as cause of breast Cancer and wrongful death in women

Posted in Personal Injury, Wrongful Death by brian
Jun 30 2008
TrackBack Address.

One of three Plaintiff’s awarded $134,000,000.00 in damages against pharmaceutical giant Wyeth died Thursday at noon, said one of her Reno lawyers, Geoff White. She was under hospice care for her lung cancer, he said. She was 65.

Forrester, Arlene Rowatt, 67, of Incline Village and Jeraldine Scofield, 74, of Fallon, were awarded $58 million after a jury found that Wyeth drug, Prempro, used to counter menopausal symptoms, caused their breast cancer.

The results of two large-scale studies on the health risks and benefits of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) for post-menopausal women dropped a bombshell of bad news this year. The Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) study, sponsored by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH), and the UK’s Million Women Study, sponsored by the British Medical Research Council (MRC) and Cancer Research UK, both found that HRT significantly increases the risk of invasive breast cancer. The US study also found higher risks of heart attack, stroke and blood clotting. The NIH took the unusual step of halting the WHI trial and recommended that women stop taking HRT for mild menopausal symptoms.

The jury initially ordered Wyeth to pay $134 million, but Washoe District Judge Robert Perry ruled that the verdicts were the “result of passion and prejudice” and should be lowered.

The $58 million remains the highest amount awarded yet as Wyeth faces thousands of similar cases across the country. Wyeth has appealed the verdict to the Nevada Supreme Court.

“One of her best events was her ability to get some degree of justice from Wyeth even though she knew she was going to die,” White said.

“The decisions made in corporate boardrooms in Philadelphia and New Jersey can have tragic consequences for a family in Yerington, Nevada, and did in this case,” White said

1 Comment »

FACING THE FORECLOSURE GIANT

Posted in Foreclosures, Real Estate Law by brian
Jun 05 2008
TrackBack Address.

If you are one of the thousands of American’s facing foreclosure, you may have a great deal more bargaining power than you ever thought. Analysis from Freddie Mac and large banks show that their cost to foreclose on your home is in the range of 60,000 dollars on average[1].

The high cost of foreclosing on a loan is ample evidence that lenders have a strong incentive to work out the problems with the loan and try to find an accommodation. Unfortunately, many individuals have found that talking to their lender is like banging their head against a wall – it gets you nothing but a headache. But understanding their language and knowing the right questions to ask can make the experience easier to stomach. That’s where a knowledgeable real estate attorney is invaluable.

The first step is determining what you can realistically afford. The next step is to sit down with your attorney and discuss what your legal options are. Many individuals are intimated to even call attorney, often in fear of what it may cost. Surprisingly, a good attorney can assist you for much less than what you’d expect. And the savings, down the road, to your credit report and pocket book are immeasurable.

The foreclosure option that may work for you may not work for your neighbor. Some of these options include:

1. Deed in lieu of foreclosure

2. Short sale approval

3. Payment modification

4. Payment forebearance

5. Payment extension

Next week, I’ll discuss in more detail each of these options.

As always, feel free to contact me with specific questions at our Royal Oak Office: 248.744.5000

[1] Lender cost of foreclosure: $58,759– Craig Focardi, CMB, Research Director, TowerGroup’s consumer lending division, cited by Dona Dezube, “Heroic Homeownership,” Mortgage Banking, (June 2006) p. 82.

2 Comments »

How to Measure Distance Under the “100 Mile Rule”

Posted in Divorce & Family Law by brian
Jun 05 2008
TrackBack Address.

In 2001, the Michigan Legislature enacted MCL 722.1. This statute is commonly referred to as “The 100 Mile Rule.” The statute says that, in cases where the parties have joint Legal custody (which is usually the case), then one party can not change the residence of the child/children to a location that is more than 100 miles away from the residence at the time the case was started, unless the other party agrees to the move, or unless the Court approves the move.

However, the statute did not specify whether to use radial miles (calculated by drawing a straight line from the original residence to the new one), or road miles (calculated by using a program like Mapquest to determine the distance in road miles between the two residences). However, in the recent Michigan Court of Appeals case Bowers v. Vandermeulen-Bowers, the Court approved the lower court’s use of radial miles when applying the 100 Mile Rule. The case was issued for publication on March 25, 2008. So, when calculating miles under the “100 Mile Rule,” pull out your rulers and draw a straight line!

If you are involved in a divorce or custody proceeding where either you or the other party wishes to move with the children more than 100 miles away, it is crucial that you have an experienced Family Law Attorney protect your interests. At Dailey Law Firm, we offer free initial consultations to all our prospective clients. Please call our office at 1-866-LAWYER, and we would be happy to schedule and appointment.

No Comments yet »

Legal Help for Traumatic Brain Injury Victims

Posted in Personal Injury, Traumatic Brain Injury by brian
Jun 05 2008
TrackBack Address.

60

1 Comment »

Driver License Restoration

Posted in Criminal Defense, Driver’s License Restoration by brian
Jun 05 2008
TrackBack Address.

Most people who have had their license revoked by the Secretary of State (”SOS”) have been convicted of multiple drunk driving charges. In Michigan, if you are convicted of 2 drunk driving charges within 7 years, then your license is automatically revoked for at least 1 year. If you are convicted of 3 drunk driving charges within 10 years, then your license is automatically revoked for at least 5 years.

At the end of the 1 or 5 year period, in almost every case (except cases where the multiple drunk driving convictions all happened before January 1, 1992), the person must request a Hearing before the SOS. At the SOS Hearing, the person must prove they are completely sober and that they actively participate in a structured support group, such as AA. The SOS is HIGHLY technical in how they review these cases, so it is crucial that you are represented by an experienced driver license restoration attorney to ensure you have the best chance of success. In most cases, if you lose an SOS Hearing, you must wait a full year before you can re-apply, which is why it is so important to ensure proper preparation for the SOS Hearing.

Our Driver License Restoration specialist, Attorney Matt Catchick, has been representing individuals in Driver License Restoration cases for nearly twelve years, with tremendous success. Please call Matt Catchick at 1-866-66-LAWYER, and he would be happy to schedule a free initial consultation with you.

No Comments yet »

Traffic Tickets

Posted in Criminal Defense, Traffic Tickets & Violations by brian
Jun 05 2008
TrackBack Address.

Few things are more frustrating or stressful than seeing the flashing lights of a police car in your rearview mirror. Although traffic tickets are expensive (usually between $100.00 and $200.00), their worst impact is on your driving record. Most insurance companies will penalize you with higher rates for five to seven years, and the ticket is posted on your Michigan driving record for at least seven years!

Many people make the mistake of hiring a lawyer after they have already accumulated several tickets, which makes it far more difficult for the lawyer to negotiate with the prosecutor in trying to keep the ticket off your driving record. Whenever you get a traffic ticket, EVEN if you have a PERFECT driving record, you should always consult with an attorney to assess your options and discuss your best direction. It is far easier to keep a perfect record perfect, as opposed to trying to help someone who has a terrible driving record.

At Dailey Law Firm, our traffic specialist, Attorney Matt Catchick, has successfully handled literally hundreds of traffic tickets throughout Metro Detroit and the surrounding area. If you ever receive a traffic ticket, call Matt Catchick at 1-866-66-LAWYER before you simply pay the ticket. He will be happy to give you a free initial consultation and provide you with expert, honest advice on your best options.

No Comments yet »

Pages

  • Home
  • Legal Tips

Categories

  • Attorneys and Lawyers
  • Bankruptcy
  • Courts and Judges
  • Criminal Defense
    • Traffic Tickets & Violations
  • Divorce & Family Law
  • Driver’s License Restoration
  • Elder Law
  • Estate Planning
    • Probate
    • Wills and Trusts
  • Michigan Courts and Judges
  • Personal Injury
    • Traumatic Brain Injury
    • Wrongful Death
  • Real Estate Law
    • Foreclosures
  • Uncategorized

Archives

  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • July 2008
  • June 2008

Meta

  • Log in
  • Valid XHTML
  • XFN
  • WordPress
Site Developed by Woodward One Media All Rights Reserved